Talk:Children of the Thunder
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 12 December 2018. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
main thesis edit
The main thesis of the review is that the book is about sexual freedom and the negative side effects which may occur.
I don't agree with that.
Brunner created a last cry of a prophet not honored in his own land. He just got mad about all the ever rising stupidity (in his notion) in society, politics, culture, arts etc. And he created a plan of revenge: "Infect the world with a dominant mutation of man who do use their brain." That's the plot. This sexual thesis is just a reflex of not willing to see the obvious. With this thesis the creation of a dominant mutation makes no sense but is counterproductive.
Maybe I reread the book some day and rework this article. Horst Emscher (talk) 16:09, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
- Which is to say that this article is basically original research. Richardson mcphillips (talk) 19:14, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
Everything except the first sentence is OR. So please DONT delete the article but delete the OR. (Tried to do this, but the bot wont let me.] 95.90.115.121 (talk) 17:05, 12 December 2018 (UTC)