This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 20:56, August 18, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
Reprioritising 2019 novel as the subject of this article
Latest comment: 7 months ago4 comments2 people in discussion
I'd like to propose this page be rewritten to be about Breasts and Eggs, the bestselling 2019/2020 work the author is best known for. Content about the 2008 novella should be condensed into the 'publication history' section. My reasoning is as follows:
The 2019 novel is more disserving of Wikipedia article than the 2008 novella; it's a New York Times Notable Book of the Year and one of TIME's Best 10 Books of 2020. The 2008 novella is still notable as it won the Akutagawa Prize but this is the English-language Wikipedia: the 2019 edition is currently massive in the Anglosphere while the 2008 novella is little more than a curiosity.
The intro to the Mieko Kawakami article refers prominently to the 2019/2020 novel yet links only to this article about the 2008 edition, which is very confusing.
The Google knowledge graph pulls content from Wikipedia, and so it describes the book as "a 2008 short novel," while everything else in the top Google results refer to the 2019/2020 novel.
The 2019/2020 edition is the latest and most definitive incarnation of this work; the original 2008 novella is just a moment on the road between the book's beginning as a blog and the current bestselling novel; as such the information about the 2008 novella should be moved to 'publication history'.
Well I don't think we are going to agree which novel is more "deserving" of a Wiki article, because they both are. Whether they are split, or this article divided, I don't know. Especially considering the second book is sheerly an expansion/revision of the first one.
As for my response to your reasoning(s).
NYT/TIME puffery lists aren't to be regarded as our guiding light when crafting an encylopedic article. And this being English-language Wikipedia has no relevance. We are not to tailor every non-English novel/film/etc article to its English edition or popularity in English territories. There are plenty of Japanese novels popular in the West that are of only moderate popularity back home. And vice versa. Our presentation of the available information should not be arbitrarily structured proportionally.
You mentioned the intro of the author's article earlier in your edits. The intro section of that article was overhauled[1] in February 2021 by the user Miwakon, who also similarly tried to mass delete content off this article in favor of the 2019 version [2]. I'm not sure why you think the changes made by a random single-issue account on a separate article must dictate this article. I didn't write that article. But I have now restored the intro section so this discussion no longer even matters.
Yes, because the English translation of Natsu Monogatari takes the first novel's original name (i.e. not 'Summer Stories')? Also see my first point again.
This argument is simply not true and frankly hamfisting your opinion as truth. Dismissing the 2008 novel as "just a moment on the road between" shows a glaring disregard for the available information in both Japanese in English.
Again, I welcome changes to the article to perhaps divide the content, but not removing such content altogether as in your edit in some arbitrary push to elevate one publication over the other.
Then I suggest a split. It just seems to me that the novel everyone's talking about -- that has been widely discussed in English-language media and that you can get in practically any bookshop and library in the English-speaking world -- should have its own article. An article about the 2019 novel could contain some text from this current article in a section on the publication history. Angry Candy (talk) 12:57, 10 October 2023 (UTC)Reply