Talk:Chemirani Ensemble

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Article status edit

I came to this article because I was researching the ensemble for presentation on a radio program. It appears to me that any question of notability was an error or has been corrected. That and my interest in the article eliminates the validity of the notability tag, so I will remove it. As in many cases I've observed in recent years, I want to caution those who tag articles to be careful that the basis for their actions is not simply their lack of knowledge of the subject. Also, I would like to suggest to editors that the purpose of a project such as Wikipedia is more about inclusion than exclusion. Xerlome (talk) 00:52, 16 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chemirani Ensemble. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:03, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply