Talk:Charles III Philip

Latest comment: 1 month ago by SafariScribe in topic Requested move 29 September 2024

Requested move 29 September 2024

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Moved per WP:Naming conventions (royalty and nobility), WP:PRECISE, and WP:CONCISE. User:AndrewPeterT, please help with the HATNOTES. (closed by non-admin page mover) Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 07:38, 7 October 2024 (UTC)Reply


Precise and concise. Per the WP:Naming conventions (royalty and nobility) guideline and the WP:Article titles policy, article titles should not contain disambiguation when no disambiguation is needed. Surtsicna (talk) 21:36, 29 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Support - There is no need to indicate these sovereigns' positions in their regnal titles, as the article ledes provide this context. Moreover, I would like to add that while it appears there are other people named Charles Philip, Maximilian Emanuel, and Maximilian Joseph who have Wikipedia articles, these ruler's regnal numbers should be sufficient to disambiguate them per WP:SMALLDETAILS (and I would be happy to add hatnotes if necessary). AndrewPeterT (talk) (contribs) 22:37, 4 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.