Talk:Caudron G.3

Users

The list of users refers to the Caudron 60 - is this a typo or are these the wrong users ftor the G3? Nigel Ish 20:41, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, it was the G.3--MoRsE 21:34, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

In the "variant" section, I read "G.3.12, was equipped with a more powerful 100 hp Anzani 10 radial engine". I think the G.3.12 was equipped with a 80 HP Le Rhône engine. I don't know which engines equipped G.3.13, G.3.14 and G.3.15, but G.3.16 was equipped with the Anzani 100 HP. Reference : markings on 3 propellers (2 for G.3.16 and 1 for G.3.12). Remark : "sub-serial" number (12, ..., 16) are in roman writing (ie : XII, ..., XVI) in all archives I saw, and on propellers markings. So, it would be better to name using G3 XII, ..., G3 XVI. Le Devin Plombier (talk) 01:00, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 02:41, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Caudron G.3. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070204051010/http://www.rafmuseum.org.uk/caudron-g3.htm to http://www.rafmuseum.org.uk/caudron-g3.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:59, 26 January 2018 (UTC)