Talk:Cathedral Church of St. James (Toronto)
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Cathedral Church of St. James (Toronto) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1 |
 | Material from Cathedral Church of St. James (Toronto) was split to St. James Park (Toronto) on November 15, 2023 from this version. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted so long as the latter page exists. Please leave this template in place to link the article histories and preserve this attribution. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bells edit
Not sure what you want to change it to, but the bells of Trinity Church, Wall Street, New York are another ring of 12 change-ringing bells in North America and are heavier than those at St James, Toronto —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.44.127.124 (talk) 14:30, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
It's an encyclopedic article, not an essay edit
I see that there are a lot of talented writers drawn to this article, but remember that this is an encyclopedia. Thus, your theses or opinions on Gothic cathedrals or what's the most significant part (unless it's immediately clear to an average person) is not appropriate. As objectively as you can, describe significant aspects of the history, architecture, and present parish. But keep it succinct and specifically about the cathedral, not general observations about Gothic cathedral architecture or what you feel the architect meant to achieve through the composition. That may be relevant too, but it can't dominate the style of this Wikipedia entry, or any other. I edited out what I felt was inappropriate, which wasn't that much, but significant nonetheless. The current write-up on the architecture is quite good in terms of technical details and objectivity. I will add some links to the technical terms to make it more accessible. A.Roz (talk) 03:22, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Cathedral Church of St. James (Toronto). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120320231216/http://www.heritagefdn.on.ca/userfiles/HTML/nts_1_5864_1.html to http://www.heritagefdn.on.ca/userfiles/HTML/nts_1_5864_1.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110524234858/http://www.roundabout.net/towerClock/st-james-the%20clock.html to http://www.roundabout.net/towerClock/st-james-the%20clock.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:10, 1 August 2017 (UTC)