Talk:Catalysts (The Spectacular Spider-Man)

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Catalysts (The Spectacular Spider-Man) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Catalysts (The Spectacular Spider-Man) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 5, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on December 5, 2009.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that when actress Vanessa Marshall learned that she would be playing the character Mary-Jane Watson in the Spectacular Spider-Man episode "Catalysts", she dropped to her knees and began hyperventilating?

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Animation: American Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Comics: Marvel / Spider-Man Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Related work groups:
/
	This article is supported by Marvel Comics work group.
	This article is supported by Spider-Man work group.

GA Review edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago9 comments2 people in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Catalysts (The Spectacular Spider-Man)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 17:21, 4 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

This article is in decent shape, but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article.

Is it well written?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
In the lead, "...and was based primarily on initial designs by Alex Ross for the character in Spider-Man" ---> "...and was based primarily on initial designs by Alex Ross for the character in the 2002 film Spider-Man". In the Plot, "Peter arrives at party as Spider-Man", is it just me or is a word missing? Same section, "...he's mysteriously disappeared" ---> "...he has mysteriously disappeared". In the Production section, "The basic structure was based on initial designs drawn by Alex Ross for the Goblin as he appeared in the 2001 film Spider-Man", the film was released in May 2002, not 2001.
Done The Flash ^{talk} 01:12, 5 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
Check.

B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
In the lead and Plot, please link "dinner party" to its correspondence article. In Goldman's review, not everyone, who doesn't read comics, watch the TV shows, etc., are familiar with who the Joker is. I mean I know who he is, but how 'bout your non-superhero reader.
Done The Flash ^{talk} 01:12, 5 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
Check.
Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
Is "Sony Pictures Television" the publisher for Refs. 14 and 18?
Well, it was their press release, so I'm unsure if it should be in the author field or the work field... The Flash ^{talk} 01:12, 5 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
Hmmm, that's a good question. I guess leave it like that, unless you have plans to take it to FAC, it'll be a problem there.

B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):

C. It contains no original research:

D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:

B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
Is it neutral?
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
Is it stable?
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
File:Catalysts SSM.jpg needs a lower resolution.
Done The Flash ^{talk} 01:12, 5 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
Check.

B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
If the statements above can be answered, I will pass the article. Good luck with improving this article!

-- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 17:21, 4 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the review! The Flash ^{talk} 01:12, 5 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

You're welcome. Thank you to SuperFlash for getting the stuff I left at the talk page, because I have gone off and placed the article as GA. Congrats. ;) -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 17:02, 5 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Alright, thanks again! The Flash ^{talk} 18:26, 5 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Catalysts (The Spectacular Spider-Man). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:51, 18 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic