Talk:Carnival Ecstasy

Fair use rationale for Image:Ecstasy03.jpg

Image:Ecstasy03.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:02, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Carnival Ecstasy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080214132441/http://www.khou.com/topstories/stories/khou070701_tnt_carnivalcruisedeath.329d3aba.html to http://www.khou.com/topstories/stories/khou070701_tnt_carnivalcruisedeath.329d3aba.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140309090440/http://www.kbtx.com/mobi?storyid=91761079 to http://www.kbtx.com/mobi?storyid=91761079

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:00, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

2015 Elevator Incident

I have seen the 2015 incident where a worker died doing elevator repairs removed and readded several times, usually by Lyndaship. I have added it back in, but am also starting this discussion so that if anyone feels like it should not be in the article they have a space to voice their rationale. Aickem (talk) 22:14, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for opening a discussion. As per WP:BRD I have again removed it pending the outcome of this discussion. You have also misunderstood WP:ONUS in that consensus is needed to add something and it is the editor who wishes to add it to explain why they feel it should be included. I look forward to seeing your reasons Lyndaship (talk) 16:05, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

My reason is that it is an extremely notable event to take place, with reporting on news stations and in online articles. It is also a (to my knowledge) unique event when it comes to incidents aboard cruise ships. I believe that the notability and uniqueness of this case make it worthy of recording on this page. Aickem (talk) 04:23, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Ah you see I don't think it is notable. Certainly it has been mentioned in some sources but its not something of enduring notability WP:NOTNEWS. Basically its an industrial accident caused by the errors of the poor person who was killed. There are thousands of such accidents every year, if we mentioned every one in every article you can imagine what any mining article would look like? As to its uniqueness why should an unusual accident be mentioned while a common one would not? Is it of interest to the general reader of the Encyclopedia? The article is about the ship and the death of one individual in an accident is neither significant nor notable in its history. Lyndaship (talk) 12:42, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

It's not just an extremely notable event, it's the ONLY notable event that anyone would know this ship exists for. Why a fire that killed no one is on here but a dude getting chopped in half isn't is beyond me. It should be added without question, and I question the neutrality of any editor who would say it shouldn't and would really like to know if they are employed at a PR company or not. 121.210.33.50 (talk) 12:05, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

I still don't think its notable as explained above. Oh and I am certainly not employed by a PR company Lyndaship (talk) 12:39, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi, I'm kind've new to this. I added the elevator incident, because I thought it was notable. When I sailed on Carnival Ecstasy, I knew about the incident, and not about the fire. I have since undid my edit in response to this message. Apple, Mr. (talk) 03:06, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

About the cabins on ecstasy

They should renovate the cabins again and make it like Carnival Elation and paradise to get that new decor and new TV In the cabins Kidstupid234 (talk) 17:32, 17 August 2020 (UTC)