Talk:Capitalist

This is the talk page of a redirect that targets the page:
• Capitalism
Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at:
• Talk:Capitalism

Business

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles

Psychology

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles

Sociology

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles

Economics

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles

Revert edit

Mihnea Tudoreanu reverted my edit, and asked "what was the point of that last edit?"

Here are why I made my edits:

The article had a lot of boldface text for no apparent purpose, contrary to the appearance of many other Wikipedia articles. I especially don't understand why most of the first sentence was in boldface.
This article is far too short an article to have a two-item list in it. The list flows better when made into a paragraph.
I was always taught in my English class that it's better to use "such as" instead of "e.g."
"... a pejorative, blanket term ...": Here, blanket term is the noun, so don't put a comma before it.
"... and their supporters in state-sponsored propaganda" is a dangling participle, incorrectly implying that the Soviet Union has supporters in state-sponsored propaganda.

Do you disagree with any of these? - Brian Kendig 04:13, 2 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Bold edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Ok socialist redirects to socialism so capitalist should redirect to capitalism —Preceding unsigned comment added by Halofan101 (talk • contribs)

Socialist redirects to socialism because a socialist is someone who supports socialism, which is correct. A capitalist, on the other hand, does not necessarily support capitalism. A redirect to capitalism gives the word "Capitalist" a meaning that is only a recent, secondary and still rare connotation of the word. Therefore, I oppose the redirect. DanielDemaret (talk) 17:49, 9 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Incidentally, this issue has been discussed here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Capitalism#Missing_capitalist_.28as_a_person.29_definition and lead to the redirect being removed once before. DanielDemaret (talk) 17:56, 9 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

the capitalist want to leave edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

If you are a capitalist ... please leave this area or site emediatly!!!! I can't believe that you used to know Mao Zedoong... He was a very bad person. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.36.17.20 (talk) 19:17, 25 April 2008 (UTC) People and thier relationships-I love Adam Goff and Kyle Wood —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.36.17.20 (talk) 19:22, 25 April 2008 (UTC)Reply