Talk:Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation

Latest comment: 1 year ago by M.nelson in topic Neutral Point Of View Issue

Results of Merge edit

I have merged with information from Canadian Mortgage and Housing Corporation. This has resulted in some poor prose, (duplicated info, etc.) which should be fixed up. I also created a section (Large Projects) which can be expanded upon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by David Henderson (talkcontribs) 14:17, 17 August 2005 (UTC)Reply

CMHC Influencing Calgary edit

Are you sure that it was NE Calgary that was influenced by the CMHC? After all the article stated that the NE quadrant of the city has a view of the mountains, but the mountains are to the WEST of Calgary... rasblue 03:57, 11 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

The NE is actually at a higher elevation than the west aparently. I learned about this in a Canadian Studies class at the U of Calgary from renowned professor and writer Max Foran, who's been studying Calgary's history for decades. Kilter 22:56, 11 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

New image of headquarters building edit

I've just uploaded File:CMHC headquarters Building A.jpg to the Wikimedia Commons, and I offer it as a replacement for File:CMHC building.JPG which is currently on the article page. However, I'm new here and don't want to step on anyone's toes, so I would rather someone else make the substitution if it's warranted. --Robkelk (talk) 00:13, 15 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

It's been a half-month, and nobody else has made this replacement. Is the replacement image not wanted, or does nobody read this talk page? --Robkelk (talk) 16:31, 28 February 2010 (UTC)Reply
It's been another half-month, and there have been no replies. I assume nobody cares; I'll make the replacement myself. --Robkelk (talk) 16:11, 13 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

References to CMHC in text edit

CMHC should never be referred to as "the CMHC" as it is not mentioned this way at all by CMHC or any other Government texts. The standard way to address it should be Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation or CMHC, but never THE CMHC or THE Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation.

Just a small style note. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.49.245.180 (talk) 00:51, 31 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Problems with lack of citations edit

This article has big problems. Almost nothing is cited. There are several unfounded POV statements about "conservative government" and radical new policies, etc... A lot of it seems like original research in places, specifically the recent developments section. JettaMann (talk) 14:48, 5 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Use of adverbs edit

This article uses adverbs inappropriate for an informational article. For example "drastically increased" should merely be "increased" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.66.249.182 (talk) 19:25, 5 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

SPAM edit

this looks like SPAMChiliconwiki (talk) 22:40, 22 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:31, 26 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Neutral Point Of View Issue edit

The list of references shows that this article draws heavily from documents produced by the CMHC itself. Many parts of the article seem to come directly from a brochure praising the CHMC, for example in Section History:

"The 1990s introduced a new era of science and technology, including the development of FlexHousing™, barrier-free housing, and Healthy Housing™, a concept of energy efficiency and resource conservation in home construction."

"In 1996 CMHC introduced emili, an automated insurance underwriting system that moves application approval times from days to seconds—making it easier for Canadian homebuyers to obtain mortgage loan insurance."

In the second excerpt, the claim of a causal link between the implementation of a faster underwriting system and the difficulty of Canadian homebuyers to obtain mortgage loan insurance is not clear and would require further justification. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Magicbretzel (talkcontribs) 06:32, 14 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

I agree; the article has way too much sourced to primary sources. The {{POV}} tag is reasonable and I've added {{Primary sources}}. Wikipedia doesn't need to detail all of the CMHC's programs - readers can go to the official website for that. I hope to make an attempt to clean it up myself... -M.nelson (talk) 11:12, 24 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Removed general references from article edit

The article has had {{More footnotes}} and {{Citation style}} tagged since 2016, but almost all of the article is well-sourced with inline citations. Since inline citations are doing the legwork, I've removed this list of general references from the article. If any of them can be used to source the article, please add them back using inline citations. -M.nelson (talk) 11:04, 24 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

List of refs edit