Departments.

edit

I know that the various govt. departments are headed by ministers, but I've never heard anyone refer to the "ministry of foreign affairs" or the "ministry of agriculture". It's always the department of whatever. Unless someone has a good cite, I'm going to rename the "ministries" to "departments". ManicParroT 21:59, 24 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

support True, it's called departments. Department of Home Affairs, Department of Education, etc. A ministry usually has to do with religious things. Adriaan90 ( TalkContribs ) ♪♫ 11:45, 25 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
against. No, a department and a ministry are different things. The minister is a head of a ministry, the department is headed by a director-general. Essentially, the ministry makes the policy that is carried out by the department. --Taejo|대조 15:49, 25 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Oh dear, oh dear, oh dear. Everything is named "Ministry" of this or that. That means renaming 20+ articles. Ugh. ManicParroT 19:31, 7 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Don't worry, the ministry and department are different things. --Taejo|대조 15:49, 25 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
Correct: Compare [1] and [2], which are contact details for the Department and the Ministry of Water Affairs and Forestry, respectively. They are not even in the same building, although the postal address is the same. Babakathy (talk) 09:04, 27 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Using cabinet templates?

edit

How about using the expanded cabinet templates:

instead to prevent having corrections in one place but not another? If yes, link the departments and use normal font size? -- Jeandré, 2008-08-15t20:55z, -- Jeandré, 2008-09-26t07:10z, -- Jeandré, 2009-05-09t10:40z, -- Jeandré, 2010-11-01t04:56z

Merger proposal

edit

A good idea. Thereafter, each cabinet referred to in the section above needs its own article, and a section in this article of links to the preceeding cabinets. Babakathy (talk) 09:06, 27 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

okay, the article named motlanthes cabinet has also the names of the deputy ministers. they should be added here. --Severino (talk) 10:46, 2 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Move discussion in progress

edit

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Cabinet of Albania which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RM bot 19:47, 21 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

History of the Cabinet of South Africa

edit

Please remember to copy any changes to History of the Cabinet of South Africa Gbawden (talk) 07:55, 29 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Nothing in the article about the Cabinet itself as an institution.

edit

This article is filled entirely with details of who's who in the current cabinet but is entirely lacking in information about the cabinet itself as an institution/organisation. I came here to find out if ministers must be MPs or can "outsiders" also be ministers. Look at Cabinet of the United Kingdom, Cabinet of Germany and Cabinet of Pakistan as examples of articles that cover the Cabinet itself as the subject. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 20:24, 18 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Deputy Ministers are not members of the Cabinet.

edit

Read the constitution! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 20:16, 24 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

What about government's website [3];[4]? They include the deputy ministers. --SanamBh (talk) 20:39, 24 June 2014 (UTC)Reply
File:File 0789

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.208.207.76 (talk) 11:27, 8 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Cabinet of South Africa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:15, 26 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Merger proposal

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


How about merging History of the Cabinet of South Africa into this page? The history page is a stub and is essentially just a list of previous cabinets. Jlalbion (talk) 09:45, 17 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Shadow cabinet

edit

I think that the shadow cabinet should be merged into this article. What do you think about that? 41.114.108.183 (talk) 17:36, 19 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

No, I don't think so. The Official Opposition Shadow Cabinet (South Africa) is something entirely different. LefcentrerightDiscuss 19:36, 19 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposal to move some content to Third Cabinet of Cyril Ramaphosa

edit

Text and tables under Cabinet of South Africa#Current Cabinet, including the content on “Distribution of Seats and Executive Positions Among GNU Parties” and “Proportions and ratios of positions as between GNU parties”, seem to be better suited for Third Cabinet of Cyril Ramaphosa.

This content relates to the initial formation of the cabinet on 30 June 2024, and is therefore directly relevant to the latter article. It represents a snapshot in time, but could change at any time. Such content therefore is more directly related to the scope of Third Cabinet of Cyril Ramaphosa and would help to expand it in a meaningful way. On the other hand, the Cabinet of South Africa#Current Cabinet lists the cabinet as is current at any given time. When the composition of this cabinet changes, for example if parties forming part of the “Government of National Unity” (GNU) leaves such grand coalition, two types of changes would be necessary: a) The current cabinet would need to be amended to reflect the adjusted cabinet; b) the historical change to the GNU, or potentially the eventual collapse of it, would need to be recorded elsewhere. The most appropriate location where the changes in b) should be recorded (if they happen) seems to be: Third Cabinet of Cyril Ramaphosa.

An alternative is for the above text and tables to be moved to 2024 South African government formation. However, this does not seem the best option, since such detail regarding the cabinet and deputy ministers seems more appropriate in an article about president Ramaphosa’s third cabinet. I therefore do not propose it be moved to the government formation article.

I believe the above proposed move would improve the coherence and focus of both articles. Please share your thoughts and let me know if you have any objections or further suggestions. Thanks! Zingi (talk) 08:54, 8 July 2024 (UTC)Reply