Talk:Bureau of Immigration Bicutan Detention Center

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 16:00, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

• ... that weeks into the Philippines' coronavirus quarantine, the Bureau of Immigration Bicutan Detention Center remained 278% overcrowded, with only two pregnant women having been bailed? Source: Nicole-Anne C. Lagrimas (2020-04-23). "BI still determining foreign detainees eligible for bail—spokesperson". GMA News Online. Retrieved 2020-04-28. (source for number of detainees) "Immigration eyeing bail for detained foreigners to decongest detention center". CNN Philippines. 2020-04-22. Retrieved 2020-04-29. (source for only two pregnant women being given bail)
  • ALT1:... that the Philippine Bureau of Immigration administrates a detention center where foreign detainees sometimes spend years without being either convicted of a crime or deported from the country? Source: Parry, Simon (2015-08-07). "The Forgotten: Life inside notorious Philippine detention centre where inmates 'disappear' without being charged". South China Morning Post. Retrieved 2020-04-28.
  • ALT2:... that multiple foreign detainees have escaped the Bureau of Immigration Bicutan Detention Center with the help of the guards? "Warden, 5 BI jail guards sacked over Korean fugitive's escape". ABS-CBN News. 2009-01-19. Retrieved 2020-05-02.; Punay, Edu (2016-01-06). "BI chief, 17 others liable for Korean's escape – NBI". The Philippine Star. Retrieved 2020-05-02.; Torres-Tupas, Tetch (2017-03-07). "BI relieves 9 guards over escape of Korean inmates". Philippine Daily Inquirer. Retrieved 2020-05-02.

• Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Hardcoded (video game)
• Comment: Article moved to mainspace on 29 April; hook ALT2 added 2 May, and hook ALT2 is my preferred hook.

Created by Psiĥedelisto (talk). Self-nominated at 21:50, 1 May 2020 (UTC).

• This article is new enough and long enough. The hook facts are cited inline and any of the three hooks could be used, the article is neutral and I detected no copyright issues. A QPQ has been done. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:35, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

Analogous

Hello Buidhe, thank you for your recent edits. I assume you are reviewing my WP:GAN, if so, thank you! You {{cn}}-tagged this line, and I am not sure why:

In an analogous situation to the New Bilibid Prison, numerous high-profile allegations of corruption have been made, and wardens relieved of their duty for corruption.

@Buidhe: What is uncited? Corruption at New Bilibid I guess? Because immediately after I mention two BI–Bicutan wardens who were fired. Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) ^{please always ping!} 04:51, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

Psiĥedelisto, The rest of the sentence is supported by other citations, but however the situation being analagous to New Bilibid Prison is not, since New Bilibid Prison is not otherwise mentioned in the article. (t · c) buidhe 04:57, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Bureau of Immigration Bicutan Detention Center/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Buidhe (talk · contribs) 05:10, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

Good Article review progress box Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Thanks for creating this article. I went through and made some minor copyedits. I also checked some of the sources and removed a bit of content that failed verification. Aside from one source which I flagged as unreliable and two statements needing citation, I believe this article meets the GA criteria. (t · c) buidhe 05:10, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

• Ok, I see that these minor issues have been fixed so I'll pass the article. Thanks for your contributions! (t · c) buidhe 05:30, 14 August 2020 (UTC)