Talk:Bright Leaves

This article was nominated for deletion on 29 August 2015. The result of the discussion was speedy keep.

United States: North Carolina Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	North Carolina portal This article is supported by WikiProject North Carolina (assessed as Low-importance).

Film: Documentary / American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Documentary films task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

rough work

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The following film critics, notable enough to have wikipedia articles of their own, reviewed this film according to http://www.metacritic.com/movie/bright-leaves/critic-reviews Geo Swan (talk) 01:37, 30 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bright Leaves. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131019155824/http://2012.doxafestival.ca/festival/films/bright-leaves to http://2012.doxafestival.ca/festival/films/bright-leaves

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:22, 25 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Call for discussion

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I think the current wording is misleading.

The current wording implies that the original film parallels a genuine conflict between the Duke family and the McElwee family. If you watch the film McElwee's documents his family tradition that the feature film parallels an historical conflict. However, my recollection is that he seems to have found the family tradition was mistaken.

Yes, I know my interpretation doesn't belong in article space. I am not suggesting it should. I will suggest our article should not take the family tradition at face value, when McElwee himself did not. Geo Swan (talk) 02:11, 25 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Add topic