Talk:Brent Knoll Camp

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

"....which is more correctly referred to as the "Knoll at Brent""

edit

Why? In my experience it's always shown on maps as, and known as, Brent Knoll. The statement seems to derive from this edit by an IP user at Brent Knoll in 2007. I'll remove it from this article pending any further evidence. Ghmyrtle (talk) 10:06, 30 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Which Infobox?

edit

I notice that this article uses a "Historic site" infobox. Other hillfort articles use an "ancient site" infobox (including a few that I have created). So which one is best suited to an iron age hillfort site? Just want to see what the general consensus is, and whether or not there should be an agreed uniformity? Pahazzard (talk) 12:29, 30 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

I would be happy with either. I use the historic site one because it includes a field for the "Scheduled Ancient Monument" designation, which ancient site doesn't, and have therefore been using it on List of hill forts and ancient settlements in Somerset for the articles I create. I have also seen Template:Infobox megalith used on some. To get consistency would need agreement from the various wikiprojects involved (& then would be a major challenge to replace those already used).— Rod talk 14:15, 30 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
I don't see a need for all hill fort articles to use the same infobox, as every one has a character all of its own. It's a bit like our articles on members of the House of Lords not all using 'infobox peer': where the subject is best known in some other role, for instance as a poet or as an archbishop, another infobox is likely to be more appropriate.
I am not the cleverest user when it comes to designing infoboxes and adding fields to them, but I don't see why the ancient site infobox shouldn't have a field for the Scheduled Ancient Monument designation. Is it worth asking an infobox wizard to fix that fault? Moonraker (talk) 22:41, 7 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Brent Knoll Camp. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:17, 7 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Brent Knoll Camp. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:32, 8 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Brent Knoll Camp. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:00, 12 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Brent Knoll Camp. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:48, 25 July 2017 (UTC)Reply