neutrality?

edit

Glancing at this article as currently written, it seems pretty negative beginning with the first sentence calling Todd an "operative", and continuing through insinuations that Google searching proves ignorance or something bad, that pre-election statements appear not to match up with post-election actions perfectly, etc. I am not familiar with this area, but the article seems biased negative, not neutral. --doncram 05:22, 2 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:22, 9 October 2020 (UTC)Reply