Talk:Bomba Estéreo
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bomba Estéreo article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notability edit
They were on Roskilde Festival 2009. They have been touring in UK and US. Their first album is one of the 75 most sold albums on Latin iTunes. Their song has been the song of the week in Latin iTunes. They've been signed by a relatively big record company Nacional with whom they just released a new album available worldwide. --Hleinone (talk) 21:42, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
- That is enough for notability as per WP:MUSIC. You just need to add sources to verify these claims, for meantime I am withdrawing the Speedy Deletion nomination. Hitro talk 21:47, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
- Source to here or to the article itself? It seems that them being at Roskilde is enough to fulfill the needs for the musical notability. Here's[1] anyway a link that proves that they really were on Roskilde this year. --Hleinone (talk) 22:03, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Bomba Estéreo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150225011940/http://studiogbrooklyn.com/joel-hamilton to http://studiogbrooklyn.com/joel-hamilton
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304092312/http://www.lamega.com.co/noticia/nominados-los-premios-nuestra-tierra-2014-132040 to http://www.lamega.com.co/noticia/nominados-los-premios-nuestra-tierra-2014-132040
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:06, 23 July 2017 (UTC)