Untitled

edit

To the anonymous editor who reverted my changes:

1. Welcome to Wikipedia. Your contributions have helped make this a better article.

2. There are formatting standards that apply to all Wikipedia articles. They can be found in Wikipedia:Manual of Style and related articles.

For example, it says:

"2:34 p.m. NOT 2.34 PM" (see here)

Also, numbers less than ten are to be spelled out. (See here.)

And,

"So unless there is a special relevance of the date link, there's no need to link it. This is an important point: simple months, years, decades and centuries should only be linked if there's a strong reason for doing so." (See here)

Finally, the article on Toronto is at Toronto. Toronto, Ontario is a redirect to Toronto. Please don't create this redirect again. Let's stick with the correct link.

If you have any questions, please post them here. Also, I would encourage you to register as a user. There are many benefits to doing so. Ground Zero | t 18:44, 28 November 2005 (UTC)Reply


That was me. Thanks for your courtesy. I'll respond to the four points in order.

  • AM/a.m. -- sorry about that. This notation comes up rarely enough in Wikipedia articles that I simply didn't think about there being an established style. I stand by my statement that AM is the best choice (the others invite confusion with end-of-sentence periods or the word "am"), but an established style trumps that.
  • It is not true that the style guide entry here requires "numbers less than ten to be spelled out". It says this is optional, and I say it's jarring to mix 14's and sevens. I'm reverting this change one more time, which will be the last for me.
  • Until earlier this year, Toronto was a redirect to Toronto, Ontario; I forgot that it had been reversed and didn't think to check. Thanks for the reminder.
  • On date links, my feeling is that majority practice is in conflict with the style guide, and I was attempting to conform to the former. Frankly, I think it was a mistake to make dates links in the first place; they serve very little purpose.

(23:35 UTC, November 28, 2005)

I didn't say that the style guide requires that numbers be spelled out, but on reviewing it again, I see that I misinterpreted it as being more prescriptive than it is. I still think that the numbers look dorky in this sentence, but I won't change it unless someone else agrees with me. Ground Zero | t 02:22, 1 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Assessment

edit

Changed the quality rating from 'B' to 'start' due to a nearly complete lack of citations and referencing. PKT(alk) 00:09, 12 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Changed back to 'C'. Article is missing inline citations throughout, but is not so poor as to warrant 'start' class rating. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:14, 18 April 2017 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Blue Night Network. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:56, 4 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Vomit Comet

edit

I removed this colloquial name from the article's lede. It is a pretty well-known local name for the system, though, so mentioning it somewhere in the article wouldn't be out of the question. I didn't see an obvious place to add it, but if someone wants to, here are some sources: [1], [2], [3]. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:15, 18 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

First reference with biggest night network claim broken

edit

The reference for the claim that the Blue Night Network is the biggest in North America is a broken link. Can't find any other source on this WoaItsBren (talk) 03:57, 1 November 2023 (UTC)Reply