Talk:Blackstone Inc.

(Redirected from Talk:Blackstone Group)
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Femke in topic GA Reassessment
Former good articleBlackstone Inc. was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 27, 2009Good article nomineeListed
February 12, 2023Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

Requesting updates to financial figures and Leadership section

edit

Hi, I'd like to suggest a few factual updates to this article, all of which are supported by either Blackstone's 2020 annual report or by the Blackstone website (per WP:ABOUTSELF). Pinging Sdrqaz and Fences and windows who were recently active here, in case either of you has a few minutes to spare to implement this.

  1. Lead section: In the second sentence of the second paragaph, update to: As of 2020, the company's total assets under management were approximately US$619 billion.[1]
  2. Infobox:
    • Key people: Remove Byron Wien, as he is the vice chairman of a specific division at Blackstone (Private Wealth Solutions), not of the company as a whole. (Source)
    • Revenue: Update to:   US$6.102 billion (2020)[1]
    • Operating income: Remove this parameter, it is not a metric we use/report. (And it doesn't make much sense to continue displaying the number from the old 2017 annual report.)
    • Net income: Update to:   US$2.262 billion (2020)[1]
    • AUM: Update to:   US$619 billion (2020)[1]. Also, remove the number for "real estate AUM" as this is just one component of the total AUM - reflecting just one of Blackstone's multiple business segments.
    • Total assets: Update to:   US$26,269 billion (Q4 2020)[1]
    • Subsidiaries: The companies listed here are not subsidiaries - they are a small selection of the many hundreds of companies in which Blackstone has invested over the years. In light of this, please remove the entire Subsidiaries parameter.
  3. Leadership section: The source for the following updates is the "Our People" page on the Blackstone website:
    • Remove J. Tomilson Hill from both the Executives and Board of directors subsections, as he left Blackstone in 2018 and is no longer a board member.
    • Remove Bennett J. Goodman from the Board of directors subsection, as he is no longer a board member.
    • Add the following two names to the Board of directors subsection:
      • Reginald ("Reg") J. Brown: independent director
      • Joseph Baratta: member of the executive committee

References

  1. ^ a b c d e "Blackstone Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2020 Results" (PDF). Blackstone. January 27, 2021.

Thank you, ThomasClements Blackstone (talk) 13:43, 24 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hi ThomasClements Blackstone, Section has been updated.Imcdc (talk) 12:07, 23 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - FA22 - Sect 200 - Thu

edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 September 2022 and 8 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kaisery (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Luciuszlt (talk) 00:53, 4 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

GA Reassessment

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment page • GAN review not found
Result: Delisted. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 10:39, 12 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

The article suffers from quite a few things: there are buzzwords in the lead(4), the investments are an extremely long list (1b), cn tags / occasional use of unreliable sources, many one-sentence paragraphs. Will need significant work to remain a GA. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 13:23, 4 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

  • Delist. Without even looking into the sources, it's disqualified by the fact that it's mostly proseline and excessive lists. And I don't enforce this because I've yet to see a community mandate to do so, but I personally consider a criticism section to be a layout and NPOV issue in most cases. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 16:48, 11 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.