This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Terrorism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles on terrorism, individual terrorists, incidents and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TerrorismWikipedia:WikiProject TerrorismTemplate:WikiProject TerrorismTerrorism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
A fact from Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989 appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 19 January 2009, and was viewed approximately 440 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi, under the strictest interpretation nanites specifically ones created in a laboratory are not "biological" and therefore should not be
covered under the BWATA.
Even if they are capable of self-replication as long as their function is not to attack biological organisms then it is unclear which laws would apply. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.190.160.125 (talk) 19:15, 6 October 2021 (UTC)Reply