Palestine pioneers edit

The source for this "alternative" name is from a 1939 Life Magazine, but there, it is written ("Palestine pioneer"), meaning, it is NOT the alternative name of the movement, for if it was, it would have been written Palestine pioneers since the than Life Magazine editors are seemingly more aware of the use of brackets and inverted commas than the Wikipedia editors. In fact the word pioneer was widely applied during the period from late 19th century when it became popularised based on the descriptions of the "opening" of the American West, and right to the Second World War, all in the sense of Pioneering (Scouting), but occasionally politicized. BILU, more correctly BYL"U, was largely a Jewish youth movement that undertook similar functionality: moving to new country, setting up homesteads, using agricultural technology, etc. The use of "Palestine" in the source is of course referring to the British Mandate Palestine, since the BILU members used either Russian or Hebrew and, being Zionist, would have used Eretz Yisrael. It is disingenuous to give the movement an English "alternative" name while few if any of its members actually spoke the language!Koakhtzvigad (talk) 14:08, 29 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Actually, it clearly says "Palestine Pioneers" (with both capital letters and plural Pioneers, indicating a name). Please look at the source again. —Ynhockey (Talk) 15:40, 29 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Move proposal edit

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

No consensus to move. Vegaswikian (talk) 07:10, 5 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

BiluBYL"U — From Bilu -> BYL"U to reflect that it is an abbreviation, and the initials of the transliterated Hebrew name. Koakhtzvigad (talk) 14:08, 29 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

  • No. Please see WP:HE. —Ynhockey (Talk) 15:41, 29 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose. Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Hebrew)#Abbreviations reads in part Most Hebrew abbreviations are treated as regular words for all intents and purposes. Thus, they should not be all-uppercase like English abbreviations, and there should be no apostrophes or quotation marks for separation like in Hebrew. This appears to be a case in point, and if not the onus of proof is on those in favour of the move to provide evidence. Andrewa (talk) 05:47, 30 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
I'm not sure who and why made this rule, however for now I'll withdraw this request Koakhtzvigad (talk) 12:09, 30 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
Have a look at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (Hebrew), its page history [1], talk page and talk archive pages 1 2 3 4. Changing the convention is not to be taken lightly, but it happens all the time. Andrewa (talk) 03:09, 31 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Wiki Education assignment: Zionism and the Roads Not Taken 1880-1948 edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 15 February 2023 and 11 May 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Middlebury2026, Beachpineapples (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Emmacmckee, HonchoMichael123.

— Assignment last updated by Dolly City (talk) 20:02, 3 May 2023 (UTC)Reply