Talk:Bill Schulz (television personality)

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Apology on Twitter?

edit

I look at his twitter - http://twitter.com/BillSchulz - I don't see apologies, I see more insults and efforts to deflect:

"To all canadians that keep emailing me: R u really from the land of SCTV and jim carrey? Lighten up.10:47 PM Mar 20th from TwitterBerry"

"@jpmeldrum dude. It was a joke. I thought canadiens had a sense of humor?10:35 PM Mar 20th from TwitterBerry"

Sexuality

edit

Does anyone know if he is gay? I can't seem to find something that confirms this. On red-eye he at least portrays a homosexual, I'm curious if its Shtick or actual?Racingstripes (talk) 07:36, 9 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Okay. If he was gay, wouldn't it be in poor taste to constantly joke about it on Red Eye? This isn't a forum, if you can find a reliable source that verifies this, which I'm guessing will be extremely unlikely, then you can add it. ~ ς ح д r خ є ~ 13:40, 9 February 2010 (UTC)Reply
The show is filled with satire, so no I don't think it would be in bad taste.Racingstripes (talk) 06:55, 10 February 2010 (UTC)Reply
You guys need a <satire> tag. — Loadmaster (talk) 03:28, 22 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
I think it is simply just so obvious that Bill is gay. He did that bit a couple years ago in the gay bar. Slaja (talk) 00:27, 21 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Comedian?

edit

Why is he listed as an comedian? It's not like he goes around doing stand-up or anything. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.89.25.210 (talk) 16:38, 9 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, he himself says he's not a comedian (e.g., Red Eye w/ Greg Gutfeld, 2011-08-09), so I removed those mentions. — Loadmaster (talk) 21:30, 10 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Bill Ayers

edit

Schulz has mentioned (e.g., on Red Eye w/ Greg Gutfeld, 2011-08-09) that he'd like his Wikipedia article to mention that he attended the same high school as Bill Ayers. Of course, this is problematic as to how to work such a factoid into the article itself, or even into even though there is a commonly shared category. — Loadmaster (talk) 21:24, 10 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bill Schulz. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:35, 2 November 2016 (UTC)Reply