Talk:Bevan Spencer von Einem

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Grassynoel in topic A Serial Killer?

Untitled edit

Could somebody just write his DOB? Luka Jačov 23:36, 10 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

A newspaper article gives his age as 59 in November 2004. So I've given an approximate birth year of 1945 and a link to the article. Rocksong 02:04, 26 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Well he hasn't aged because the latest newspaper article (January 2006) still has his age as 59. I'll give the link: [1] but it'll go dead in a week or so. Rocksong 00:09, 30 January 2006 (UTC)Reply


It is premature to merge the two articles in question. The crimes linked with the murder of Richard Kelvin, and von Einem's conviction of this single crime remain too ambiguous.

merger of Alan Barnes edit

I've merged the Richard Kelvin article into this as the tag had been there for a long while and have just tagged Alan Barnes for the same treatment. Any objections to the merger ( which'll probably just add a sentence to the article under the "other murders" section ) ? Peripitus (Talk) 09:13, 31 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

It seems a little disrespectful that the victims of this man should only be mentioned as a sub section of a page on him. I think it would be more appropriately handled to mention the names of his victims on the page with links to a seperate pages where the deceased individuals would have a page in their own right IMHO. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dbr21 (talkcontribs) 12:21, 13 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Cause of Richard Kelvin's death edit

'most probably' or 'certainly', but not 'most certainly', please. I suspect it's the former, but because I don't know, I haven't changed it. Lovingboth (talk) 16:03, 11 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:BevanVonEinem.jpg edit

 

Image:BevanVonEinem.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:12, 22 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:BevanVonEinem.jpg edit

 

Image:BevanVonEinem.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:15, 12 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

A Serial Killer? edit

Had von Einem's victims been adult, he would probably be described as a serial killer because they occurred over a long time period and involved the same method of killing. The fact that his victims were children should not alter in any way my opinion that he be described as a serial killer. --One Salient Oversight (talk) 04:43, 12 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

The subtitle says "accountant", amazingly. Grassynoel (talk) 14:30, 20 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Richard Dallas Kelvin edit

All the way through this article Richard Kelvin is referred to as Kelvin. I think this does the boy a disservice and I am going to change all the references to him to either Richard or Richard Kelvin. The boy is a victim and referring to him by just his surname is very impersonal. SpencerCollins (talk) 08:52, 19 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Agreed, but I think you should change it to 'Richie' instead, or maybe 'Ol' Richie Boy,' makes it sound even more personal-like. --Breshkovsky (talk) 22:06, 25 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

The Case edit

"his immediate reaction was to say that he wouldn't answer anything without speaking to his lawyer first." This is what any sane person should do in any case. Let alone the fact einem knew him from previous prostitution they had engaged in. Then passing him on to another who murdered him quite possibly.

If you are going to lie and try cover for a murderer he deserves to be in prision anyway. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.33.107.88 (talk) 10:06, 2 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bevan Spencer von Einem. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:49, 1 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bevan Spencer von Einem. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:22, 30 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:21, 22 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Subject's surname edit

References to Einem subsequent to the first should be to "Einem" and not "von Einem". I couldn't find a specific WP:MOS policy, but other good articles such as Claus von Bülow and Claus von Stauffenberg do this. At the very least, the article should consistently use either "von Einem" or "Einem" and not both, as is currently the case. I'm willing to make these edits, if no one objects.

Using "Einem" will also solve the problem of the multiple sentences beginning with a lowercase letter (e.g., "von Einem was...."). That's just wrong! Matuko (talk) 06:56, 30 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

I did some digging and some Australian sources do use "von Einem" in their stories, but they do at least capitalize the “v” if the surname begins a sentence. Matuko (talk) 07:12, 30 March 2019 (UTC)Reply