Talk:Benson raft

Latest comment: 1 year ago by MediaWiki message delivery in topic Copyright contributor investigation and Good article reassessment
Former good articleBenson raft was one of the Engineering and technology good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 14, 2020Good article nomineeNot listed
June 9, 2020Good article nomineeListed
February 25, 2023Good article reassessmentDelisted
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on October 11, 2010.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the Benson raft (pictured) was a huge sea-going log raft designed to transport millions of board-feet of timber at a time through the open ocean?
Current status: Delisted good article
WikiProject iconOregon Unassessed Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis page has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
The current collaborations of the month are Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at Oregon Women of Achievement (modern) or Women of the West, Oregon chapter (historical).


Pictures edit

This article should really only have one or two pictures, not every available picture of the raft. Since the photographs exist on Wikimedia Commons, please utilize the Commons template. The359 (Talk) 06:27, 11 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Rubbish. What's the problem in having so many photos? It's not like we are short of space here. Each of the photos has something unique and informative to it. A gallery is fine.
Every photograph ever is unique. That does not mean they are all necessary in a relatively short article. Some images are informative, but most are redundant or easily explained by text. This is an encyclopedia, not an image gallery. Please see Manual of Style - Images. The359 (Talk) 07:27, 11 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
In this particular case, the unusual nature of the topic (the assembly of large numbers of logs into a single sea-going raft) probably justifies more photos than usual. The photo gallery does illustrate the process.Mtsmallwood (talk) 11:01, 11 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Propulsion edit

I came here to ask for more inofrmation about how the rafts were propelled - towed by tug? 81.147.147.215 (talk) 06:50, 11 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

In answer to the person asking about how the rafts were propelled, it seems from the photos that they were treated as a barge and pushed, rather than pulled. By so doing, the barge may be steered by the 'pusher' engines with a higher degree of control than can be applied by simply towing a non-steering mass. I hope this makes things more clear. You might have a look in the appropriate portal for more information about barges, especially those on the major rivers of the world, and those in the Gulf of Mexico. Best Regards, Drieux 07:59, 11 October 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Drieux (talkcontribs)

Some of the picture captions say:

  • Sternwheeler pushing Benson raft ca 1906
  • Benson sea-going log raft being pushed down Columbia River
  • Steamers "Shaver" and "Henderson" pushing log raft
I think they were mostly pushed.--Doug Coldwell talk 20:34, 11 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Till... edit

Are these rafts still being launched? When was the last one launched? This article leaves me curious as to the success and fate of the project72.201.219.8 (talk) 11:15, 11 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

The article does answer the question with: The operation went on until 1941 with over 120 log rafts built...
Additionally it says: There were only four of these sea-going log rafts lost, due to fire or storms. --Doug Coldwell talk 11:29, 11 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
But, what the article does not really address is, why are Benson rafts no longer used, if they were so efficient?72.94.182.41 (talk) 02:27, 12 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
Economic reality altered. The roads back then were enough to cause almost anything that could be shipped via water to be so sent. Since the late 1930s, the roads from/to the Pacific Northwest have improved by orders of magnitude. Also in that same interval, the local timbering industry in SoCal has dropped the price on common lumber and tree products well below the point where only specialty products can compete. Best regards Drieux 17:29, 12 October 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Drieux (talkcontribs)

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Benson raft. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:48, 31 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Copyright contributor investigation and Good article reassessment edit

This article is part of Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/20210315 and the Good article (GA) drive to reassess and potentially delist over 200 GAs that might contain copyright and other problems. An AN discussion closed with consensus to delist this group of articles en masse, unless a reviewer opens an independent review and can vouch for/verify content of all sources. Please review Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/February 2023 for further information about the GA status of this article, the timeline and process for delisting, and suggestions for improvements. Questions or comments can be made at the project talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:36, 9 February 2023 (UTC)Reply