Talk:Ben Kamin
This article was previously nominated for deletion. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Lack of Support
editThis article is NOT based upon anything but this guy's resume. It needs to be improved or eliminated. --76.31.117.185 (talk) 19:11, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
Agree with above. This article is COMPLETELY unsourced and quite clearly written by the subject himself. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Donnezmoi (talk • contribs) 17:05, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
You would think a self-touted ‘scholar’ and ‘religious leader’ would refrain from such self-aggrandizement just to disguise pretense and, at the very least, make an effort to honor Dr. Martin Luther King.
Dr. King had an ethical compass. Apparently, the author/subject needs to sell some books. I know the author (COI) and while my own Wikipedia articles were the subject of much controversy, I’m not supposed to be held to the “highest moral values of our Jewish [leaders]”. The author has a clear COI with regard to potential financial rewards from promoting his literary work (e.g. book on Dr. Martin Luther King). You can’t make this stuff up!!! I’ll risk the embarrassment for both of us. -Dr. Jordan Carlton Schaul
For reference: “Conflict of interest (COI) editing involves contributing to Wikipedia about yourself, family, friends, clients, employers, or your financial and other relationships. Any external relationship can trigger a conflict of interest. When an external role or relationship could reasonably be said to undermine the interests of improving this encyclopedia, the editor has a conflict of interest....
COI editing is strongly discouraged on Wikipedia. It undermines public confidence and risks causing public embarrassment to the individuals and companies being promoted. Editors with a COI are sometimes unaware of whether or how much it has influenced their editing. If COI editing causes disruption, an administrator may opt to place blocks on the involved accounts.” — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1012:B059:9FC:A881:578C:508C:3AEB (talk) 06:19, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Ben Kamin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070814022950/http://www.reconciliationresolve.com/ to http://www.reconciliationresolve.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:03, 17 July 2017 (UTC)