Talk:Battle of Madonna dell'Olmo

	Spain portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

France

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Military history: European / French / Italian C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	European military history task force
	French military history task force
	Italian military history task force (c. 500–present)

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on September 30, 2009 and September 30, 2010.

Pyrrhic victory? edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This doesn't qualify as a Pyrrhic victory. Though the battle wasn't a resounding success, the loses were hardly tragic for the victors (10%), and certainly more substantial than the enemies somewhat considerable 20%. An inconclusive victory for sure, but certainly not Pyrrhic. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.231.252.200 (talk) 22:20, 30 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

I agree with you. 115.131.21.237 (talk) 22:44, 30 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Battle of Madonna dell'Olmo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110722034738/http://www.granatieridisardegna.it/granatieri_in_granda_szcuneo_09.pdf to http://www.granatieridisardegna.it/granatieri_in_granda_szcuneo_09.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:35, 28 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic