Talk:Battle of Iron Works Hill

Latest comment: 12 years ago by 159.121.204.129 in topic Use of "sic"
Good articleBattle of Iron Works Hill has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starBattle of Iron Works Hill is part of the New York and New Jersey campaign series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 3, 2010Good article nomineeListed
April 28, 2010Good topic candidateNot promoted
December 17, 2010Good topic candidatePromoted
May 30, 2020Good topic removal candidateKept
On this day... A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on December 23, 2023.
Current status: Good article

Use of "sic"

edit

According to the article on sic, it is to be used when a spelling or grammatical error is in a citation and thus not an error of transcription. The citation quoted here uses a historically correct spelling of the word "maneuver." Since no error (it is historically correct) is in the citation, the inclusion of the "sic" is the error. Current usage and spelling is not superior, just different. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.121.204.129 (talk) 20:06, 28 March 2012 (UTC)Reply