Talk:Barry Glendenning

Latest comment: 4 years ago by 188.31.165.184 in topic Boring Man League

Criticism edit

A link highlighting one of his inflammatory Guardian articles was provided. It also details a small portion of comment from the section of Northern Irish society he habitually insults. The Guardian even thought it necessary to moderate their own reporters comments on his own blog. This is all simple unequivocal fact.

What is the reason for censorship? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gridsquareremoval (talkcontribs) 16:59, 10 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

You're talking about the removal of this information? An online forum is far from meeting Wikipedia's standards as a reliable source. tedder (talk) 15:18, 12 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Possible Partial Protection for Glendenning? edit

Glendenning is something of a love/hate figure on the Football Weekly podcast. Likewise, he is the most likely to respond to comments, and has been to respond to trolls and a do some troll-baiting himself. Thus, his page is vandalized surprisingly frequently. I would suggest some sort of protection of this page (such as it being partially protected) in order to discourage vandalism.Eriol11 (talk) 04:15, 10 January 2011 (UTC)eriol11Reply

I don't see why a journalist, however provocative he may be regarded as being, deserves any better "protection" than that offered to any other public figure? If no evidence is provided of accustions, obviously they can be removed; otherwise if "controversy" is his stock in trade then that should be reflected in his entry.--Oneill1921 (talk) 16:05, 8 September 2011 (UTC)Oneill1921Reply

It looks like partial protection would be appropriate here. If there's are accusations or 'controversies' then people can still add them - partial protection would mean they would have to be a named editor to do that, which reels in some of the trolling and vandalism, and makes it more likely that changes would be appropriate. The IP address of the person who made about 60%+ of the article about a passing comment on a podcast suggests they've made one other contribution to wiki from that address - to change hyperlinks to the words 'Master' and 'Baiter'...Marty jar (talk) 19:23, 21 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Blowing his own trumpet edit

How can he hear the sound of his voice if he's blowing a trumpet? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.15.70.11 (talk) 13:32, 10 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Barry Glendenning. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:27, 15 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Boring Man League edit

Barry has had a great season this year and will probably win this league very soon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.31.165.184 (talk) 10:16, 31 May 2019 (UTC)Reply