Talk:Baikal Rift Zone

Volcanoes Mid‑importance

	Volcanoes portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Volcanoes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of volcanoes, volcanology, igneous petrology, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VolcanoesWikipedia:WikiProject VolcanoesTemplate:WikiProject VolcanoesWikiProject Volcanoes articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Geology Low‑importance

	Geology portal Talk:Baikal Rift Zone is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Russia: Physical geography Low‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the physical geography of Russia task force.

Old talk edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Error? The text states it's northeastern Russia, the map indicates southeastern. 62.253.240.3 (talk) 21:54, 16 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for spotting it, amended. Mikenorton (talk) 22:26, 16 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Possible Edit edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I have a draft now at User:Al Climbs/Baikal Rift Zone. I think it is better organized, has several corrections, and is definitely expanded. I open it freely to edits, and, if we get consensus, think it should replace the current article. Anyone mind taking a look? --Al Climbs (talk) 02:03, 2 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Add topic