Talk:Aztecazo
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Community Tech bot in topic A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
 | Aztecazo has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: August 23, 2019. (Reviewed version). |
 | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
GA Review edit
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Aztecazo/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Mnnlaxer (talk · contribs) 19:51, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
Starting review. - Mnnlaxer | talk | stalk 19:51, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
| Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Well-written: | ||
|
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | Well written |
|
|
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | Complies with MOS |
| 2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
|
|
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | Verified |
|
|
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | Uses reliable sources |
|
|
2c. it contains no original research. | No OR |
|
|
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | No copyright or plagiarism problems. |
| 3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
|
|
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | Covers all aspects of the topic |
|
|
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | Doesn't go into needless detail |
|
|
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | NPOV |
|
|
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | Stable |
| 6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
|
|
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | Properly copyrighted images |
|
|
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | Follows MOS |
|
|
7. Overall assessment. | Passes |
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion edit
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:53, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:07, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
