Talk:Aspen Mountain (Wyoming)

Aspen Mountain (Wyoming) was a Geography and places good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 30, 2008	Good article nominee	Not listed

Geology Low‑importance

	Geology portal Talk:Aspen Mountain (Wyoming) is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mountains Mid‑importance

	Mountains portal This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Wyoming Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Wyoming portal This article is supported by WikiProject Wyoming.

Survey edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

WP:Good article usage is a survey of the language and style of Wikipedia editors in articles being reviewed for Good article nomination. It will help make the experience of writing Good Articles as non-threatening and satisfying as possible if all the participating editors would take a moment to answer a few questions for us, in this section please. The survey will end on April 30.

Would you like any additional feedback on the writing style in this article?

If you write a lot outside of Wikipedia, what kind of writing do you do?

Is your writing style influenced by any particular WikiProject or other group on Wikipedia?

At any point during this review, let us know if we recommend any edits, including markup, punctuation and language, that you feel don't fit with your writing style. Thanks for your time. - Dan Dank55 (talk)(mistakes) 03:36, 21 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

GA Review edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

I think this is a good start for an article, but there is much to be expanded to make it to Good Article status. Nevertheless, I've seen editors do amazing things in a short period of time, so I'm going to put the article on hold for 7 days.

First, take a look at other GA-class Geology articles. Specifically, you might want to look at Crater Lake, as it is a single geological formation, much like your article here. If you're really a high achiever, check out the FA-Class Geology articles, but don't get too overwhelmed. I would approach the fine folks at WP:GEOLOGY and ask them for assistance.

You should expand the article to complete the following sections. Each section should have at least one full paragraph that is well-referenced:

Dimensions
Formation - describing the formation and geological makeup of the mountain
History - any human history involving the mountain and the immediate area surrounding it.

The sections should come before the radio information. I would keep one or two of the radio images and replace the others with images of the mountain itself - try the US Geological Survey or the US Department of the Interior for fair use images. I would also add a map to show its location in Wyoming.

Second, for issues within the current article:

Lead

Make sure your lead reflects what is in the article. You'll have to expand the lead to match expansions of the prose.
To say that a location on an older map was "incorrectly name(d)" is often a misnomer. Many locations have had multiple names given them by multiple cartographers who spoke different languages, as well as names given to formations by Native Americans that were re-named by settlers. I would instead say it has appeared on earlier maps as "Quaking Aspen Mountain". (Period outside of quotations)

Radio and television stations

Lists are not advisable in GA articles. You can convert this list to prose.

Other uses

References always go outside punctuation.
Link and/or explain this term: amateur radio repeaters. This would be considered WP:Jargon for folks like me who have no idea what radio equipment consists of.

Access

This section has no references. In a GA class article, every paragraph must have at least one citation.

Gallery

I hope with expansions the gallery will be justified, but with the amount of prose in the article now, there are too many images.

I'm going to leave a note on the WP:GEOLOGY talk page because this is a lot of work. If you have questions or need clarification, you can leave a note here or on my talk page. Good luck. --Moni3 (talk) 13:17, 23 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

It's been seven days and few changes. I hope you'll be able to improve the article and submit it for GA in the future. --Moni3 (talk) 18:01, 30 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Assessment comment edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Aspen Mountain (Wyoming)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

*A good start on citations but there are no references given for elevation and the coordinates.

The "Access" section requires sources.
See also the GA review comments on the main talk page for further improvement suggestions.

RedWolf (talk) 17:45, 28 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Last edited at 17:45, 28 December 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 08:26, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Aspen Mountain (Wyoming). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:50, 19 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic