Talk:Ascocoryne sarcoides

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Good articleAscocoryne sarcoides has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 23, 2009Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 23, 2009.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that colonization of mature black spruce trees by jelly drops (pictured) helps protect them from future infection by rot-causing fungi?

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:Ascocoryne sarcoides/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

A very nice article. I tried to find a link for gelatinous, but there is nothing appropriate.

GA review (see here for criteria)

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): Clearly and concisely written   b (MoS): Follows relevant MoS  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): Well referenced   b (citations to reliable sources): Sources are reliable   c (OR): No OR  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): Covers the major areas   b (focused): Remains focused on topic  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias: Neutral in view  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.: Stable  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail: Pass  

A fine article. Congratulations!

Mattisse (Talk) 20:33, 23 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ascocoryne sarcoides. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:05, 10 July 2017 (UTC)Reply