Talk:Armadillidium vulgare
 | A fact from Armadillidium vulgare appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 21 February 2009, and was viewed approximately 1,882 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Limited light in relationship to people section edit
This page and the page for Armadillidiidae both cite the same source regarding the amount of light pillbugs require, but this page says they need "limited light" while the Armadillidiidae page says they need "lots of light". How can one citation be used for opposing statements? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fatbrett2 (talk • contribs) 03:26, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
Missing Information edit
This article is missing important information on the species' behavior which should include the species breeding habits, diet, and other important behavioral information. This needs to be added to the article in order to meet Wikipedia's standards and guidelines of a well developed article.--Paleface Jack (talk) 18:12, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Armadillidium vulgare. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
- Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.plantpress.com/wildlife/o109-commonpillwoodlouse.php
- Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.nhm.ac.uk/woodlice/results/old/armadillidium_vulgare.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:45, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Image may be an A. nasatum edit
I think this image (used as the third image in the article) is of an A. nasatum, not A. vulgare, judging from the forward protrusion in the middle of the head. A. vulgare should have a smooth head. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SlurExe97 (talk • contribs) 06:29, 24 May 2018 (UTC)