Talk:April 2018 inter-Korean summit

speedy delete -

edit
  Resolved

- this event hasn't even taken place yet. Merge with NK-SK relations. 50.111.3.17 (talk) 20:54, 29 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Well, it probably will take place soon. There's no harm in having it.--Jack Upland (talk) 00:13, 30 March 2018 (UTC)Reply
It is happening right now. Chongkian (talk) 01:00, 27 April 2018 (UTC)Reply
It has happened. // sikander { talk } 17:41, 28 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Romanization of the North Korean name.

edit

Why the same 북 is romanized as Puk/Buk in the South Korean name, but Pung/Bung in the North Korean name?--140.180.246.195 (talk) 06:31, 29 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

See Revised Romanization of Korean --Alexchen4836 (talk) 01:49, 2 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

2 summits: Split into 2 articles?

edit

Chinese Wikipedia and Korean Wikipedia already created articles named 2018年5月朝韩首脑会晤 and 2018년 5월 남북정상회담(May 2018 inter-Korean summit) to distinguish from 2018年4月朝韓首腦會晤 and 2018년 4월 남북정상회담(April 2018 inter-Korean summit) respectfully. Should we do the same here? —Wei4Green (talk) 03:49, 27 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

"2018 inter-Korean summit" Wikidata page"May 2018 inter-Korean summit" Wikidata pageWei4Green (talk) 04:03, 27 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
  • Merge - These series of meetings are very close in terms of date, and are about the same topic. These series of meetings are historic, but since the second meeting in 2018, one single meeting is not quite historic. —— CommInt'l (talk) 19:36, 30 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
  • Support – Per previous responses, very notable summits in modern history that need to be split up to give more information. JE98 (talk) 19:14, 2 June 2018 (UTC)Reply
  • Support - The inter-Korean summit in May was extremely significant to South Korea; the two parties willingly agreed to meet, and this event was not planned. Another significance of this event is that the summit was held in North Korea, not at the Peace House in South Korea; it was held in secret, so citizens in South and the North had no knowledge about this event- until the Korean broadcasting companies documented it. However, we can possibly continue to add more information on the Inter-Korean summits article as well instead. I think it is best at this moment to split the two summits into two articles. --Poeticfeelings (talk) 09:01, 7 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Location

edit

Both summits were held at essentially the same place: the Joint Security Area. The first was in Peace House in the south; the second at Unification house in the north. See Inter-Korean Peace House and Unification pavilion. The JSA is sometimes called Panmunjom, but that article is largely about the village as it existed in 1953 (and which no longer exists). We shouldn't imply that the summits were in completely different locations. Saying the second summit occurred in a North Korean "village" is highly misleading. The JSA is not a village. Also, saying the meeting was at the DMZ is imprecise as the DMZ stretches the width of the peninsula.--Jack Upland (talk) 08:09, 27 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:07, 1 July 2019 (UTC)Reply