Talk:ApolloCon

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Wikifying

edit

I don't know exactly what was meant by "Wikifying", but I've given it my best shot. Perhaps the addition of dates, locations, attendance, and other guests for past ApolloCons would help. I don't have that info to hand, though. Also- no mention of the homemade film video track? Redneckgaijin 20:42, 17 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Community participation

edit

Since there was a request on LJ for suggestions to improve this page, I'm offering this just by way of a suggestion. The "community participation" section reads like a list of sponsors requesting plugs, and might raise some objections. The statement "Some of the recently participating people are also members of these organizations" is a very tenuous justification for inclusion. Some of the members probably are also members of the Democratic or Republican party, but that's not relevant to the con. Knowing how fandom works, probably some or all of these organizations have provided help as organizations. If they could be identified as such, this would produce a list that might be shorter but would have a clear connection to the topic of the article. GMcGath 12:56, 19 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

I'm not happy with the section either and have decided to be bold and have removed the list. --Spartaz 15:50, 19 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

2008 Date

edit

Official word from the head of ApolloCon registration sets the dates at June 20-22 but another editor says they've heard from the con chair is that it will be June 27-29. In the absence of an update to the ApolloCon webpage, could somebody on the concom or the con chair please let us know what the correct dates will be? Dravecky 19:37, 9 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Just for the record, this has been cleared up and the date on the page is correct. - Dravecky 05:59, 26 September 2007 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on ApolloCon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:53, 5 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on ApolloCon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:43, 8 July 2017 (UTC)Reply