| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Apadmi Ltd article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 9 November 2016. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Speedy Delete/ A7 Material edit
A Digital marketing agency just like thousands in the world. Awards are non-notable as the company itself. Only here to build SEO/ Online Reputation and nothing else. Light2021 (talk) 18:27, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
- I disagree. An app for the British Museum is significant and credible, as is the app for The Guardian newspaper. I'm not in the UK, but the awards and newspapers that it are reported in seem significant and credible. To quote WP:A7 "If the claim of significance is credible, the A7 tag can not be applied, even if the claim does not meet the notability guidelines.". It cannot be said that there is "No indication of importance" in the article.
- Perhaps it wouldn't survive AfD, but it's not A7.
- I've removed the advert tag, as the sentences don't seem particularly advertisement like to me. I don't see much self-promotion there (as opposed to plain fact giving, e.g. "based in", "they develop" and "founded by"). peterl (talk) 06:38, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
Further reading edit
- Gal, Hannah (July 2, 2014). "From BBC iPlayer Radio to the The X Factor - The Secret of Apadmi's Success". The Huffington Post. Retrieved November 17, 2016.
{{cite web}}: Invalid|ref=harv(help)
K.e.coffman (talk) 02:09, 28 November 2016 (UTC)