Talk:Anthony Collins (philosopher)
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Amakuru in topic Requested move 9 January 2022
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Freethinking
editDid Collins coin the term freethinking? --Blainster 17:03, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
Requested move 9 January 2022
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved — Amakuru (talk) 21:57, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
– no clear WP:PRIMARYTOPIC per page views [1] Joeykai (talk) 20:19, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support per nom. Station1 (talk) 22:43, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 23:34, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support the footballer has 590 views, the composer has 177 and the judge has 104 compared with only 323 for this one. Crouch, Swale (talk) 09:17, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
- Weak oppose The footballer is not that distinguished, despite his page views, whereas the philosopher warrants mention at Age of Enlightenment. The footballer is already a former player and his views will likely decline, perhaps precipitously. Once this athletic flash-in-the-pan passes his cultural "best before" date (and his page views hurtle toward cruel, forgetful world), the philosopher has more mentions than the other two combined. Metrics can sometimes be a good guide, unless they become The Tyranny of Metrics (2019) as documented by Jerry Muller. — MaxEnt 01:38, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.