Talk:Andrew Sabisky
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Djm-leighpark in topic Redirect is a surprise
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 17 February 2020. The result of the discussion was redirect. |
 | The contents of the Andrew Sabisky page were merged into Second Johnson ministry on 8 March 2020 and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Andrew Sabisky redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to the intersection of race/ethnicity and human abilities and behaviour, which is a contentious topic. Please consult the procedures and edit carefully. |
 | Arbitration Ruling on Race and Intelligence The article Andrew Sabisky, along with other articles relating to the area of conflict (namely, the intersection of race/ethnicity and human abilities and behaviour, broadly construed), is currently subject to active arbitration remedies, described in a 2010 Arbitration Committee case where the articulated principles included:
If you are a new editor, or an editor unfamiliar with the situation, please follow the above guidelines. You may also wish to review the full arbitration case page. If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Requested move 18 February 2020
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved to the proposed title at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 17:21, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Andrew Sabisky → Andrew Sabisky appointment – This article should not continue as a biography of a living person (BLP) because of the 1 event rule (WP:BLP1E). However, the appointment of Andrew Sabisky to an adviser role within the Prime Minister's office and the controversy which ensued leading to his sacking/resignation has been a significant, notable event within UK politics. The appointment (and not the person) does merit an article and that is why I am proposing this move. (I have made a similar argument under the current AfD discussion). Oska (talk) 21:08, 18 February 2020 (UTC) —Relisting. BegbertBiggs (talk) 22:51, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
- If changed, this should instead be in sentence case as "Andrew Sabisky appointment", per WP:TITLEFORMAT. Grayfell (talk) 00:10, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
- I'd agree with that "appointment", and while I've done some touching up on the article and talk while passing to be clear that should not imply I'm in support of article retention, this move or any other, or a redirect with history and may possibilities and maybe printworthy.Djm-leighpark (talk) 00:34, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose. If kept it should stay as it is. He's not notable for his appointment. He's actually far more notable for his resignation and the reasons for it. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:21, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
- The appointment of Sabisky was what generated controversy (given his previously stated views). The controversy and political pressure following that appointment led to his sacking/resignation. So the appointment & subsequent resignation are two sides of the same coin and obviously both would be covered in the article. Oska (talk) 05:52, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose per Necrothesp.--Ortizesp (talk) 13:59, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose per Necrothesp. Also just a note to say I've made a minor tweak to the proposed target, since our manual of style would suggest appointment should start with a lower case letter. This is Paul (talk) 18:10, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Redirect is a surprise
editThe 17 February 2020 AfD redirect result to Second Johnson ministry is a WP:SURPRISE as Andrew Sabisky is not mentioned at the target article. @Wikimandia please a organise appropriate content at (I'd suggest a WP:ANCHOR) on the target. Alternative @GPL93, Kurtis, StonyBrook, Buidhe, and This is Paul: or elseone please assist. Please avoid WP:UNDUE weight on the target. Thankyou.Djm-leighpark (talk) 07:13, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- I'm not sure why you're singling me out. I didn't close out the AfD. It should have been merge and then redirect. Please be bold and organize it yourself. —МандичкаYO 😜 07:21, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Wikimandia As far as I can tell you were the first to make that !vote in the AfD. My BOLD more would be to refer back to closer if nothing is done. I observe StonyBrook has already claimed to have got it sorted with a merge and a glance seems to indicate that is the case. Thankyou.Djm-leighpark (talk) 08:05, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- Djm-leighpark
Done StonyBrook (talk) 07:50, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
