Talk:Andrew Pelling
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
Conservative? edit
The parliament website still lists him as an Independent - did he actually rejoin the Conservative whip? — sjorford++ 23:00, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
He is an independent, the Conservatives offered him the whip, but he refused their offer because it would be an admission of guilt when he was totally innocent and they unfairly removed it, instead of supporting him
Grammar edit
I'm trying to reproduce the last sentence in the first paragraph as a grammatically correct one but there's a constant edit conflict. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.184.98.185 (talk) 15:27, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
Working while on sick leave.... edit
There's no mention in his article about him being employed while officially being on (paid) sick leave from the house of commons. Surely this should be mentioned?! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.24.233.173 (talk) 19:54, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
Leader of Greens?? edit
"The Leader of London’s Green Party" the Greens do not have such a position. WHO was it who said this? Maybe their name can be included here. OR at least a proper source - as now it's rumour. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.113.96.60 (talk) 23:38, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- It's now sourced as a claim made on AP's own website. This in a way removes the problem of the allegedly non-existent Green position, since we are now simply reporting verbatim what Pelling says. With more research it might be possible to source the original statement, but I wouldn't hold your breath, and this is not bad for now. Hope this helps, best wishes, DBaK (talk) 00:40, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Andrew Pelling. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040228183356/http://www.london.gov.uk:80/assembly/members/pellinga.jsp to http://www.london.gov.uk/assembly/members/pellinga.jsp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:10, 13 October 2016 (UTC)