Talk:Andrés Roemer
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This is an advertisement page not an encyclopedia article - FIXED edit
It indeed read like an ad for Roemer. I pared the introduction down to the essentials. I'll work on the rest of the page.
Edit: the needed edits can't be done. I request some help here.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.130.242.169 (talk) 22:07, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
- I cut out a load of the non-notable nonsense that filled this page. Probably the most absurd work of self-promotion I've ever seen on Wikipedia. 2806:2F0:99C0:F893:306C:2C9F:DF29:DF4A (talk) 06:57, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
This is an advertisement page not an encyclopedia article edit
This page looks like an advertisement blogpost to promote Roemer’s CV rather than a serious encyclopedia article.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.190.22.73 (talk) 16:35, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
He isn't journalist edit
Hi, Andres Roemer isn't journalist, he appears in TV programs but he didn´t study journalism, please see Andres Roemer's CV: http://www.cndh.org.mx/sites/all/fuentes/documentos/transparencia/19/andresroemer.pdf Thanks --Werther mx (talk) 18:55, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
Roemer should stop his blatant self-promotion edit
Like we couldn´t tell it was Roemer himself who wrote this trash:
"Through his diverse roles, Roemer has shaped intellectual discourse on public affairs all around the world"
So, Roemer happens to be the XXI century Weber, Rawls or Marx.
Kind of patetic
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.190.22.73 (talk) 16:35, 22 August 2017 (UTC)