This is an advertisement page not an encyclopedia article - FIXED edit

It indeed read like an ad for Roemer. I pared the introduction down to the essentials. I'll work on the rest of the page.

Edit: the needed edits can't be done. I request some help here.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.130.242.169 (talk) 22:07, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply 
I cut out a load of the non-notable nonsense that filled this page. Probably the most absurd work of self-promotion I've ever seen on Wikipedia. 2806:2F0:99C0:F893:306C:2C9F:DF29:DF4A (talk) 06:57, 29 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for that. I have removed the "like a CV" tag. Tacyarg (talk) 09:07, 30 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

This is an advertisement page not an encyclopedia article edit

This page looks like an advertisement blogpost to promote Roemer’s CV rather than a serious encyclopedia article.

 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.190.22.73 (talk) 16:35, 22 August 2017 (UTC)Reply 

He isn't journalist edit

Hi, Andres Roemer isn't journalist, he appears in TV programs but he didn´t study journalism, please see Andres Roemer's CV: http://www.cndh.org.mx/sites/all/fuentes/documentos/transparencia/19/andresroemer.pdf Thanks --Werther mx (talk) 18:55, 26 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Roemer should stop his blatant self-promotion edit

Like we couldn´t tell it was Roemer himself who wrote this trash:

"Through his diverse roles, Roemer has shaped intellectual discourse on public affairs all around the world"

So, Roemer happens to be the XXI century Weber, Rawls or Marx.

Kind of patetic


 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.190.22.73 (talk) 16:35, 22 August 2017 (UTC)Reply