Talk:American Anti-Vivisection Society

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Qscgy256 in topic NPOV dispute (Campaigns)

NPOV dispute (Campaigns) edit

The "Campaigns" section only presents the AAVS point of view, and doesn't provide any statements supporting the use of animal testing, even though it is definitely a contested issue. It also uses phrases like "could possibly" and "claim", which imply that the position of "scientists" (a vague term) is wrong. In order to fix this, the statement could be changed to a cited statement from someone or some group in favor of animal testing. Dr. Croce's claim about animal testing also needs something from the other side, since it is far from a statement of fact. Finally, the "Pound seziure" section, besides needing a more neutral word than "racketeers", also fails to have any citations or statements from the other side, so there is no way of knowing if the information is actually true, or just propaganda. Qscgy256 (talk) 03:15, 7 July 2015 (UTC)Reply