Talk:Alta controversy

Latest comment: 2 years ago by 89.8.145.104 in topic Sources

Merge

edit

The organisation Folkeaksjonen mot utbygging av Alta-Kautokeinovassdraget is a part of the controversy, of no relevance outside that context, and could probably be better handled within the scope of this article about the controversy. -- Hurven (talk) 11:59, 15 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Agree.Labongo (talk) 14:24, 17 February 2010 (UTC)Reply
Keep the articles seperate, IMO. (Hopefully I can contribute referenced material in English to both mentioned articles, time permitting.) --Edelsteinen (talk) 11:25, 23 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
A search in A-tekst tells me that there probably is enough material to keep a separate article about the organization. Great if Edelsteinen tries to reference the article. Note that per WP:V english sources are preferred but other languages are certainly allowed. Naturally Norwegian sources will be central when editing these articles. Rettetast (talk) 20:41, 23 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
Anyone who has access to a Norwegian public library, has access to at least one source of references, for the 2 mentioned articles. (Alta - Kraftkampen som utfordret statens makt ; ISBN 13 978-82-05-33943-9 and ISBN 10 82-05-33943-0 ). --171.23.129.11 (talk) 09:12, 25 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

"Legacy" and the 2011 attacks

edit

Why are the Oslo/Utøya attacks referenced in the "Legacy" section? Where is the connection and how is it relevant? Clarification, context? (88.193.55.106 (talk) 19:00, 6 May 2012 (UTC))Reply

Assessment comment

edit

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Alta controversy/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

The article is a reasonably complete overview, but still misses:
  • A more detailed chronology, with key individuals involved
  • Graphics, especially a map, and ideally also photographs from the various incidents
  • A more comprehensive bibliography
--Leifern 22:08, 12 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Last edited at 22:08, 12 February 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 07:27, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Alta controversy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:44, 4 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Sources

edit