Talk:Sex chromosome

(Redirected from Talk:Allosome)
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Geoffrey.landis in topic Irrelevant sections

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 31 August 2021 and 10 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Hafiza Sara Akram.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 09:02, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Request to add to the sex determination section of this article

edit

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mehnazt/sandbox

Above is a link to my sandbox. My draft for the sex determination section is there. Let me know what you guys think. I'm thinking of adding information about plants/intersex people as well. --Mehnazt (talk) 00:08, 27 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Etymology

edit

Perhaps a statement about etymology would be helpful? The Greek language has two words meaning different: hetero and allo. As I recall from Greek class 30 years ago, (sorry I'm not looking this up right now): allo, different but of the same kind; hetero, different of different kinds. Bob Enyart, Denver radio host at KGOV (talk) 14:16, 7 July 2012 (UTC)Reply


I am username sachipatel and I am improving this page for a biology project under the supervision of Mr. Bohrer at Waynesville High School. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sachipatel (talkcontribs) 14:01, 19 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 5 March 2018

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved as requested per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 06:28, 16 March 2018 (UTC)Reply



AllosomeSex chromosome – Outdated, allosome hardly registers on ngrams and completely outnumbered in searches, also sex chromosome used in infobox Iztwoz (talk) 07:55, 5 March 2018 (UTC)--Relisting. Dekimasuよ! 17:34, 12 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

This is a contested technical request (permalink). -- AlexTW 08:58, 5 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Polycomb Repressive Complex 2?

edit

@Chaya5260: Your addition on "The deactivated X-chromosome" and "Polycomb Repressive Complex 2" sounds interesting but could use a citation. Can you provide such? Thanks, DavidMCEddy (talk) 05:16, 27 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for reminding me of this oversight on X chromosome. I have now added a citation to X-chromosome[1]. I believe I had added a citation to PRC2 itself. The citation was [2]

References

  1. ^ Brockdorff N (November 2017). "Polycomb complexes in X chromosome inactivation". Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci. 372 (1733). doi:10.1098/rstb.2017.0021. PMC 5627167. PMID 28947664.
  2. ^ Veneti Z, Gkouskou KK, Eliopoulos AG (July 2017). "Polycomb Repressor Complex 2 in Genomic Instability and Cancer". Int J Mol Sci. 18 (8). doi:10.3390/ijms18081657. PMC 5578047. PMID 28758948.)
Thank you for the response.
QUESTION: I now see Brockdorff but not Veneti in the References.
Should the Brockdorff reference be advanced one sentence and Veneti be added where Brockdorff currently is?
I'm asking. I very much appreciate you contributions. I don't know enough to feel confident in doing anything with this. Thanks again. DavidMCEddy (talk) 02:22, 7 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Wrong topic

edit

The title of the article suggests this should be about sex chromosomes in general, but most of the article exclusively talks about the XY system, even though a separate article on that topic already exists. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.61.180.106 (talk) 00:42, 5 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Irrelevant sections

edit

The sections 2.1 Previous theories on sex determination and 2.2 Sex determination as understood today both seem to be primarily about X-inactivation, and are only peripherally relevant to this article. Geoffrey.landis (talk) 01:48, 25 January 2022 (UTC)Reply