Talk:Alberta Clipper pipeline

Energy Mid‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Canada: Alberta Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Alberta.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

"Illegal" expansion of Alberta Clipper Pipeline

This article of April 20, 2015 explains the apparent subterfuge related to the presidential permit for the expansion of the US section of the pipeline, from a point on the border south of Winnipeg to Superior WI: http://america.aljazeera.com/articles/2015/4/20/Enbridge-Canada-oil-pipeline.html

Today - July 15 - I received a petition from Credo, which of course is not an authoritative source. The headline in the email is "Call President Obama: Stop Enbridge’s illegal tar sands expansion". This is quite a stretch. Also, mention is made of "doubling" the capacity of the line. Actually, 450kbbl/day to 800 is a hair over an 80% increase. Link to the petition: http://act.credoaction.com/call/whitehouse_clipper/?t=3&akid=14978.6703678.pcrPiW Mathyeti (talk) 23:14, 15 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Add topic