Talk:Albert Folens

Learn more about this page

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Ireland Low‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An image is requested for this article as its inclusion will substantially increase the significance of the article. Please remove the `image-needed` parameter once the image is added.

It is requested that an image or photograph of Albert Folens be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Allegations of collaboration

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The contribution by 193.1.40.28 looks like it belongs more on the talk page than the main entry. Anyone have any opinion on whether I should cut and paste it to here? Autarch 12:16, 28 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Discription of Flemish Legion is completely wrong

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

It is obvious that the text about the Flemish Legion is not correct. It sais:

"Flemish Legion which was a nationalist Flemish party fighting for Flemish independence from France"

Most stupid is of course that they would be fighting for independence from France. Flanders was obviously not a part of France at the time, but, as it is today, part of Belgium.

Also, the Flemish Legion wasn't a party. It was a legion of volunteers that was recruited by the Vlaams Nationaal Verbond to go fighting with the German army against the Soviets. Before this VNV initiative this recruitment was only done by the Algemeene-SS Vlaanderen.

Since I am Flemish and English isn't my native tongue, I didn't correct this in the article... --Bertnederbelg (talk) 11:07, 7 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Claim interview was defamatory

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The sentence "Had they been published when Mr. Folens was alive, they would have been considered defamatory", referring to the Senan Moloney interview used in Hidden History is unclear. Does it refer to Folens own words? (Can one defame oneself?) Does it apply to inferences made from his words? The Dictionary of Irish Biography refers to it, while it may not prove that he was in the Gestapo (but he was in the Sicherheitsdienst) it doesn't reflect well on him - the summary of the interview describes antisemitic comments made by him.

In short, the sentence I quote above seems like a case of breach of WP:EDITORIAL or at the very least it should require a reference to back it up.Autarch (talk) 00:48, 24 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic