This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked
Coverage and accuracy: not checked
Structure: not checked
Grammar and style: not checked
Supporting materials: not checked
To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Latest comment: 1 month ago5 comments3 people in discussion
I propose that Aeryon Scout be merged into Aeryon Labs. I don't think the product is independently notable enough to justify its own article (setting aside the concerns both articles have about coming across as overly promotional). Ich(talk) 12:34, 11 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
@Ahunt:, thank you, I missed the note on the other talk page. I'm still not certain it's necessary to have separate articles (relying on WP:PRODUCT and WP:INHERITORG here).-Ich(talk) 14:00, 12 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
The article has three independent media refs, so it is obviously notable in its own right, meets WP:GNG. In general within WikiProject Aircraft we keep manufacturer's articles and aircraft type articles separate as long as there are sufficient refs to support the aircraft type as a stand-alone article, which there is in this case. - Ahunt (talk) 14:26, 12 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
Now 6 years later, the official website seems dead after the buyout.The way this Forbes blog post writes about the Skyranger, it says the it is produced by Teledyne FLIR now. So I'm not sure if the Waterloo offices are even active or not. Harizotoh9 (talk) 06:05, 3 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=small}
