Talk:Adam and Steve
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 23 December 2008. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
edit
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 13:24, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
2007-01-31 Automated pywikipediabot message
edit | This page has been transwikied to Wiktionary. The article has content that is useful at Wiktionary. Therefore the article can be found at either here or here (logs 1 logs 2.) Note: This means that the article has been copied to the Wiktionary Transwiki namespace for evaluation and formatting. It does not mean that the article is in the Wiktionary main namespace, or that it has been removed from Wikipedia's. Furthermore, the Wiktionarians might delete the article from Wiktionary if they do not find it to be appropriate for the Wiktionary. Removing this tag will usually trigger CopyToWiktionaryBot to re-transwiki the entry. This article should have been removed from Category:Copy to Wiktionary and should not be re-added there. |
Removed "concern" and "transwiki" templates
editI believe that this has the potential to become more substantial than a dictionary definition, because of the cultural references in various titles. Also, (aside from the usual Wikipedia rules), at least this image can be used (from this context]), and I'm sure it wouldn't be too hard to find another one outside the Internet. If anyone (besides a robot) would like to object (and, given the article's current shortness, I can certainly see why), go right ahead. —Lenoxus 05:43, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
What other information can we put on here>
editI just searched Google for about an hour and found NOTHING relevant that should go in this article. I am at a loss. I don't know how to expand this article. Chexmix53 (talk) 19:53, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
William Dannemeyer
editWilliam Dannemeyer phrased it as "God's plan for man in this world is Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve."[1] -- AnonMoos (talk) 16:14, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Notability
editTwelve years ago Lenoxus wrote above that this article might expand via cultural references. But it hasn't, and it won't. I don't doubt that innumerable passing cultural references could be found, but that would be in the nature of a collection of trivia, which fails WP:SIGCOV: "Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention". This article will never be more than a stub, and in any case, doesn't have enough notability to survive as a standalone article. It was properly transwikied to Wiktionary. The Wikipedia article should be deleted, or perhaps merged, if an appropriate target article can be found; perhaps as part of Christian right#Sex and sexuality, or Christianity and homosexuality. Mathglot (talk) 23:00, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
- No, I think this qualifies as significant coverage. StAnselm (talk) 00:46, 3 October 2019 (UTC)