Talk:Abu Hafs al-Masri Brigades
| While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small} | Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment edit
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 13:17, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Untitled edit
One of the links send you to the official website of The Dwight School somebody can change that right?
The link is titled "Abu Hafs official website"
Danke
misc edit
I deleted two dead links, and Juan Cole is not a meaningful source on this subject IMO.
No bigshot like bin Laden or al-Zawahiri has ever acknowledged this Abu Hafs outfit.
LDH 21:16, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
Problems with this Post edit
The first problem with this post is the lack of information that is given, especially for the background of the group. A majority of the background is about the name of the group. There must be some credible sources in the scholarly literature that give basic information regarding Abu Hafs al-Masri Brigades. Another problem is the list of attacks that are attributed to the group. There isn't hardly any direct links that allow for the reader to check the actual event and reassure the credibility of the author. I also would advise that the credibility section be more in depth. This section seems more like opinionated statements from readings than actual data or cited information which gives the author less credibility. I think if you are going to write a page about this particular group then rather use a credibility section to basically say the group may not even exist, maybe do more research and find facts that prove that this group does indeed exist. TheBasher55 (talk) 03:13, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
Revisions edit
This article has no information about the origin of this specific group There are no references or citations for any of the information provided, just links to different pages of information. There is no citation for the "credibility" of the page. The "claimed attacks" need to have specific wiki listings about the happenings of each attack. There is some irrelevant information about the leaders in the opening paragraph. There is no actual credible information provided that states the group even exists, could all be just propaganda and falsely claimed attacks for attention. Samo56 (talk) 16:27, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
Credibility edit
I had noticed that while discussing credibility for attacks, there had been a few redirects which lead to articles which are in no way related to the attacks. For example, the Ba’athist party had split long ago, it’s impossible for them to carry out an attack on Baghdad years later, however, the Arab Socialist Ba’ath Party’s Iraq region likely would. For Kurdish Hezbollah, they’re talking about the sunni islamist group, not Lebanese Hezbollah.
Thanks -ProEditorNotApproved