Talk:Abdel Ghalib Ahmad Hakim
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Abdel Ghalib Ahmad Hakim redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
prod? edit
I left a note on the talk page of the person who left a {{prod}} on this article. I had questions about their use of WP:COATRACK as a justification for deletion.
I pointed out that it was just an essay.
I questioned the value of simply stating COATRACK when the essay doesn't encourage deletion, except
In extreme cases, when the nominal subject is barely notable and there is little chance the article can be salvaged, deletion of the entire article may be appropriate.
I stated the opinion that there was no discussion, here on the talk page, to show anyone had suggested this was an extreme case.
That user responded that wikipedians were entitled to nominate articles for deletion for any reason, citing: WP:PROD and WP:DEL#REASON. They addied:
I would just remind you that Wikipedia is not a soapbox.
I hope that they will return here and offer a more helpful description of their ocncern(s). In particular I hope they can explain what triggered their soapbox comment.
Cheers! Geo Swan 19:59, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
responsible use of tags... edit
Someone placed an {{npov}} tag on this article. That tag, when instantiated, tells readers to look at the talk pag for an explanation for the tag. But the individual who placed this tag did not leave an explanation.
I am going to wait a reasonable amount of time, and then remove the abandoned tag. Geo Swan (talk) 18:56, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
rough work edit
These links to the page numbers within the OARDEC documents may be useful to other contributors. Geo Swan (talk) 20:31, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
| CSRT allegations | 50 |
| CSRT transcript | 15-21 |
| ARB 1 allegations | 105-107 |
| ARB 2 allegations | 33-35 |
| ARB 3 allegations | 19-21 |
| ARB 3 decision | 29-38 |
- Another useful link is the The Guantanamo Docket it is an interactive database provided and updated by the New York Times. The database is searchable and has the Pentagon documents (CSRT and ARB) included. Additional documents and reliable New York Times research regarding the detainees at Guantanamo are also provided. This is the link to the documents and research regarding Abdel Ghalib Ahmad Hakim. IQinn (talk) 10:44, 7 January 2010 (UTC)