Talk:A West Wing Special to Benefit When We All Vote

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Fourthords in topic Congrats and possible sources

still under construction? edit

I saw the {{Under construction}} template was removed, but this article does not yet justify its existence in my opinion. The previous incarnation of this page was a redirect to The West Wing#A West Wing Special to Benefit When We All Vote which currently (again in my opinion) provides far richer context and detail. Unless this page is expanded considerably, I think simply reverting to the redirect would serve our readers better. Thank you CapnZapp (talk) 10:30, 28 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

@CapnZapp: Yeah, it's still under construction, I'm working on it. Give me a few days, or just move it to a draft, either way. theleekycauldron (talkcontribs) (they/them) 20:30, 28 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
Take your time. CapnZapp (talk) 21:12, 28 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Did you know nomination edit

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Vaticidalprophet (talk) 12:25, 12 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

5x expanded by Theleekycauldron (talk). Self-nominated at 22:02, 28 March 2021 (UTC).Reply

  •   New enough when nominated, long enough, copyvio checked. Good hook, is cited. Need better inline citations for the Act Breaks section. Not seeing QPQ. Would be GTG with these issues addressed. HouseOfChange (talk) 13:02, 31 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
@HouseOfChange: I only have 1 DYK credit, I thought it wasn't necessary? Regardless, I'll fix those issues today and get back to you. And I'm happy to do a QPQ either way. theleekycauldron (talkcontribs) (they/them) 19:15, 31 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Theleekycauldron:, no QPQ needed since you are so new, which I did not realize. Welcome to DYK! Look forward to seeing this DYK ready to go soon. HouseOfChange (talk) 20:28, 31 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
@HouseOfChange: I reviewed Template:Did you know nominations/Clayton Powell and fixed the inline citations. Thanks so much! 20:36, 31 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
  @Theleekycauldron: Good job, thanks for the quick fix and for fine work on an interesting topic! And your review is also very welcome, given the perennial DYK backlog. HouseOfChange (talk) 22:59, 31 March 2021 (UTC) Reply

References

  1. ^ CNN, Review by Brian Lowry. "'The West Wing' enlists big names for its When We All Vote reunion special". CNN. Retrieved 2021-03-28. {{cite web}}: |last= has generic name (help)

Congrats and possible sources edit

Congrats; I'm so glad this is going to be a DYK. The episode was such a wonderful reunion and recreation. You might want to add info from these two sources. The first is from the podcast "West Wing Weekly" [1]. Aaron Sorkin is interviewed and it includes some interesting information. I know that podcasts aren't the most reliable sources, but I think there can be a case made for its inclusion, especially since you're already including TVLine and the When We All Vote website. You should also include Tommy Schlamme's DGA win: [2]. Ok, ok, what's next? ;) 16:30, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Thanks so much! I'm really excited. I'll definitely check out those two sources, thank you. If you've got anything on the President's secret plan to fight inflation, that'd also be welcome :). theleekycauldron (talkcontribs) (they/them) 17:13, 14 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Figureskatingfan: oop theleekycauldron (talkcontribs) (they/them) 17:13, 14 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
Ah another Wingnut, I love it! For that, I give you The Signal. [3] Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 20:14, 14 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

list of sources edit