Talk:A Different Kind of Love Song

A Different Kind of Love Song has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: December 23, 2013. (Reviewed version).

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Women in Music

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

GA Review edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago8 comments2 people in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:A Different Kind of Love Song/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Gabriel Yuji (talk · contribs) 16:20, 12 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
Ok.
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
Ok.
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Ok.
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Mention the release of the single in "Composition" does not seem appropriate. Also, it's said in the lead it was released as a double A-side single with "The Music's No Good Without You", which is not covered in the body. Gabriel Yuji (talk) 16:20, 12 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Sigurd Rosnes is not mentioned in the Allmusic source about Living Proof, and I've checked the song page and Rosnes isn't mentioned too. See. Gabriel Yuji (talk) 16:39, 12 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Done all. Jorn ^talk 23:49, 14 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hm... It was relased as a double A-side single with "The Music's No Good Without You", wasn't it? You must to source the information instead of removing it from the article if it's correct. Them, you must to cite it in the article's body. Sorry for the delay. Gabriel Yuji (talk) 01:14, 17 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Also, from what place did you draw the information of Sigurd Rosnes as one of the writers? You must to cite it. The CD shows her as a writer or don't you know it? Gabriel Yuji (talk) 01:35, 18 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

I think it's all

Done. See it. Jorn ^talk 14:35, 22 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Passing. Gabriel Yuji (talk) 20:51, 23 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Add topic